Hello, Guest!
 
 

 
 
  Objects Tiiips Categories
Lynk&Co 02 pros, cons, costs and common fixes
"Descrizione"
by Al222 (23974 pt)
2025-Dec-29 18:30

Lynk & Co 02

Country of production

The Lynk&Co 02 for the European market is produced in China (for the “02” family, the Zhangjiakou plant in Hebei is referenced within the Lynk & Co/Geely manufacturing).

Short description

The 02 is a 100% electric coupe-crossover with a “digital” approach: primarily online sales, generous standard equipment, a modern interface, and a more “lifestyle” positioning than a purely family-focused one. In Europe it is offered with a simple, rational configuration: a single RWD powertrain (rear motor) rated at 200 kW, a 66 kWh battery, and a declared range of up to 445 km (depending on trim/homologation). On the road it prioritizes smoothness, quietness, and EV responsiveness, with decent performance (0–100 in 5.5 s) without becoming extreme.

Powertrain and performance

Spec02 Core02 More
Motor / layout1 rear electric motor, RWD1 rear electric motor, RWD
Power200 kW (272 hp)200 kW (272 hp)
Max torque343 Nm343 Nm
0–100 km/h5.5 s5.5 s
Top speed180 km/h180 km/h
Combined consumption (indicative)~17.6 kWh/100 km~17.6 kWh/100 km
Battery66 kWh66 kWh
Range (WLTP, indicative)435–445 km435–445 km
DC chargingup to 150 kW (10–80% in ~30 min)up to 150 kW (10–80% in ~30 min)
AC charging11 kW22 kW

Note: figures can vary by homologation, temperature, and real-world conditions; charging times are referenced to optimal conditions and suitable infrastructure.

Dimensions and capacity

SpecificationValue
Length4,460 mm
Width1,845 mm
Height1,573 mm
Wheelbase2,755 mm
Ground clearance (indicative)~191 mm
Kerb weight (indicative)~1,820–1,895 kg
Trunk (min–max)~410–1,349 L (some sources indicate up to ~440–1,400 L)
Braked towingup to 1,600 kg

Note: trunk capacity can vary depending on the measurement method (VDA) and the source.

Main trims and indicative pricing

VersionFrom (€)
02 Core35,495
02 More39,495

(Indicative pricing; it may vary with promotions, packages, and on-the-road fees. Model oriented toward online sales.)

Maintenance and early service (indicative costs)

(Estimates for a premium/near-premium electric crossover: they depend on the network, geographic area, and tires.)

InterventionTypical cost (€)
Annual check/service250–500
Brake fluid (periodic)120–220
Cabin filter80–170
Front brake pads250–550
Front discs + pads700–1,400
Tire (each, 19–20")220–450


Pros

  • Well-judged figures: 200 kW, 0–100 in 5.5 s, and a declared range up to 445 km.

  • Simple range structure: two trims, same powertrain, clear differences (especially AC 11 kW vs 22 kW).

  • DC charging up to 150 kW with a reference 10–80% ~30 min.

  • Good usable space for the category, plus towing up to 1,600 kg (notable for an EV in this segment).

Cons

  • Single drivetrain layout (RWD only): coherent for efficiency/simplicity, but it does not cover those wanting AWD.

  • Non-trivial weight: noticeable in spirited driving, as on many BEVs.

  • Very software-driven experience: perceived quality and satisfaction also depend on update cadence and infotainment/services stability.

  • An attractive entry price, but the More trim level quickly approaches the pricing of better-known competitors in the segment, which, however, benefit from a well-established and widely distributed service network.

  • Lack of explicit public details on server location (i.e., where do my data go and who controls them?). In the official privacy and connectivity documents published on the Lynk & Co website (including the Privacy Policy and terms of service), it is not clearly specified where the servers that manage vehicle connectivity, telematics data, or the app are physically located.

In summary

The Lynk & Co 02 is a modern electric coupe-crossover: decent performance, adequate range, and a digital-first proposition with two trims differentiated above all by AC charging. The Core is the value-oriented choice, while the More makes sense if you truly leverage 22 kW AC charging and want the extra comfort/tech content.

Verdict — Lynk & Co 02 (Model year 2025, BEV “coupé crossover”)

Compact electric SUV · Trims: Core / More · Rear electric motor · Rear-wheel drive · Output 200 kW (272 hp), torque 343 Nm · Battery 66 kWh (declared; nominal capacity is also cited as ~69 kWh in some sources) · Range up to 445 km WLTP · 0–100 km/h 5.5 s · Top speed 180 km/h · DC charging up to 150 kW (10–80% ~30 min) · AC charging 11 kW (Core) / 22 kW (More)

The Lynk & Co 02 is the brand’s fully electric offering in a “coupé crossover” format: youthful and highly connected, with a straightforward technical recipe (RWD, single motor, mid-size battery) and tuning aimed at ease of use and smoothness. Its 2025 positioning revolves around two practical strengths: competitive WLTP range for the segment and fast-enough DC charging to make longer trips realistic, without chasing record peak charging figures.

On the road, the character is typical of modern BEVs: instant low-speed response, good traffic smoothness, and intuitive driving. The rear-wheel-drive layout also helps in terms of steering feel and cleaner turn-in, while remaining a car primarily designed for comfort and daily usability rather than extreme sportiness.

Key technical points:

  • Motor and performance: 200 kW (272 hp) and 343 Nm, RWD, 0–100 km/h 5.5 s, top speed 180 km/h.

  • Battery and range: declared 66 kWh battery (with some spec sheets also citing ~69 kWh nominal); range up to 445 km WLTP (depends on configuration/wheels).

  • Charging and touring: DC up to 150 kW, with 10–80% ~30 minutes; AC 11 kW (Core) / 22 kW (More).

  • Dimensions and practicality (order of magnitude): length about 4.46 m, wheelbase 2,755 m; claimed boot ~410 L (up to ~1,400 L with seats folded, depending on measurement criteria).

  • Trims and product logic: Core as the more essential configuration; More typically focused on equipment and comfort (in addition to higher AC charging capability).

CategoryWhere it shinesWhere it holds steadyWhere it falls short
Design & imageModern coupé-crossover stylingRoad presence in line with European compact EVsNot “classic premium”: more tech/minimal
Performance0–100 in 5.5 s: decent in real useSmooth, usable power delivery180 km/h top speed: coherent with efficiency, not absolute performance
Range & touringUp to 445 km WLTP: credible for mixed useStrong coherence for commuting + weekendsReal range is sensitive to speed, climate, and tires
Charging~30 min 10–80% DC; AC up to 22 kW (More)Easier trip planning with 150 kW HPCTo benefit, you need well-maintained, uncongested DC infrastructure
Driving dynamicsRWD: cleaner turn-in feelHigh comfort and predictabilityCompact-SUV weight/tuning: not a sports car
Practicality~410 L boot and compact-SUV cabinVersatility suitable for 2–3 people plus luggageCoupé roofline can slightly reduce rear headroom
Technology & ADASNatively connected, service-oriented productPacks/equipment coherent for the segmentFunctions can vary by market/spec and software updates
Ownership costsEV: potential advantages on energy and routine maintenanceGood “plug & go” logicInsurance/tires can weigh in; residual value depends on used-EV demand


Who it is for

Drivers who want a compact electric SUV with a connected approach, decent everyday performance, and a charging/range package that can support trips—provided they have regular access to AC charging (home/office) or local HPC.

Who should consider alternatives

If you need AWD for specific requirements (snow, frequent towing, demanding mountain routes), or maximum family cargo capacity and a more traditional SUV stance, more square-shaped and/or AWD alternatives may be more coherent. Likewise, if you want flagship-level performance (sustained higher speeds, higher outputs), performance-oriented BEVs may be a better fit.

Recommended configuration

  • More if you want to maximize daily usability and resale prospects: 22 kW AC charging and typically richer equipment are tangible medium-term advantages (especially if you often charge away from home).

  • Core if your goal is to optimize entry cost and you charge mostly at home: it is the more rational choice when extra equipment is not decisive.
    In both cases, for real-world use it is advisable to avoid extreme wheel/tire combinations if the goal is range and comfort, and to verify access to 150 kW DC infrastructure in your area.

Evaluate