Hello, Guest!
 
 

 
 
  Objects Tiiips Categories
YASHICA EZF1031
"EZF1031, good performance"
by FRanier (10033 pt)
2026-Jan-06 17:38

Yashica EZF1031

Type: Low-cost digital compact camera
Reference period for reviews: Approximately 2009 (still referenced online)
Category: Point-and-shoot / entry-level
Market segment: Amateur users and beginners


2. Main technical specifications

ParameterReported value
Sensor1/1.8″ CMOS (small-sized sensor)
Maximum photo resolutionApproximately 10 megapixels
Optical zoomApproximately
Lens aperturef/2.8 (wide) – f/5.1 (tele)
ISOFrom 100 to 6400 (reported maximum)
LCD displayApproximately 3″ (size)
VideoNot specified by primary source; likely VGA or 480p typical of the era
StabilizationPossible user-activatable stabilizer (software/mechanical) indicated in menus
BatteryRechargeable NP-900 type (small Li-Ion)
WeightApproximately 0.18 kg (180 g)


Key technical notes:

  • A 1/1.8″ sensor is typical of budget compacts and usually delivers modest image quality, with more visible digital noise in low light compared to larger sensors.

  • A zoom range is functional but limited for telephoto use, mainly suitable for basic urban or landscape photography.

  • Variable apertures in low-end compacts generally imply compromises in bokeh rendering and depth-of-field control.


3. Detailed technical assessment

3.1 Sensor and image quality

Pros:

  • A 10 MP sensor allows medium-size prints and is adequate for social sharing or non-professional use.

Cons:

  • Relatively small sensor → less effective noise management in low light and limited dynamic range.

  • Nominal resolution does not necessarily translate into real optical quality, especially with budget lenses.


3.2 Lens and zoom

Pros:

  • 3× zoom provides basic versatility for general subjects (landscapes, simple portraits).

Cons:

  • No clear indication of anti-reflective coatings or higher-grade optics → potential chromatic aberration and reduced edge sharpness.

  • Limited apertures reduce creative control over depth of field.


3.3 Operational performance

Pros:

  • Straightforward operation, with menus and controls oriented toward beginners.

Cons:

  • Slow operation reported by users (startup and focus response).

  • Likely dated UI and non-instant menu navigation.

  • Autofocus and shutter responsiveness not suitable for fast-moving subjects or dynamic shooting scenarios.


3.4 Battery and autonomy

Pros:

  • The NP-900 rechargeable battery is typical for compacts of that era and is often easy to source as a replacement.

Cons:

  • Small-capacity compact batteries usually mean modest autonomy; a spare is advisable for longer outings.

  • USB charging and/or charger availability cannot be assumed, depending on the kit configuration.


4. Comparison with other compacts from the same era

AspectYashica EZF1031Typical 2008–2011 compacts
Sensor1/1.8″ ~10 MP1/2.3″ ~10–12 MP
Optical zoom3×–5×
LCD3″2.7–3″
Burst/speedslowvariable, often better
Usabilitysimplevaries by tier
Image qualitystandardgenerally more consistent

Interpretation: The EZF1031 sits in the lower end of consumer compact cameras: acceptable for basic shooting, but typically weaker than more advanced compacts—even from the same era—especially in autofocus, speed, and integrated optics.


5. Pros and cons – Technical summary

Main pros

  • Often very low price on the used market.

  • Adequate performance for basic amateur photography.

  • Simple handling and easy operation for beginners.


Main cons

  • Slow operational speed (startup and focusing), which reduces effectiveness in dynamic situations.

  • Image quality constrained by the small sensor and budget optics.

  • Lacks modern features such as Wi-Fi, GPS, advanced stabilization, or clearly stated HD video capabilities.

  • Likely limited video versatility (no explicit 720p/1080p indication in the available references).


6. Conclusion

The Yashica EZF1031 is a low-end digital compact camera, primarily suitable for casual users, collectors, or anyone looking for a simple device for occasional photos. It does not compete with modern smartphones or mid-range compacts in terms of image quality or operational performance, but it can still be considered a low-cost option when high technical requirements are not a priority.

A certain slowness when turned on and in focus, but then the images are sharp and bright.

It has a button at the top, next to the shutter button, which activates the image stabilizer.

Evaluate