![]() | "Descrizione" about TKMARS TK913 by Al222 (21098 pt) | 2025-Jul-17 19:53 | ![]() |
Read the full Tiiip | (Send your comment) |
The TK913 is a compact and lightweight GPS tracking device, available in both 2G and 4G versions. It features a built-in rechargeable 1500 mAh lithium battery, a SIM card slot, USB charging port, and a LED indicator for status updates. The 4G model also includes a physical power button.
The tracker provides good autonomy (up to 15 days in standby), GPS accuracy up to 5 meters, and can be operated via SMS commands or through an app. It is suitable for tracking cars, motorcycles, luggage, or individuals.
On newer models, the default password may not be 123456, but instead the last 4 digits of the device’s ID number (printed on the label). Be sure to verify the correct password before sending commands.
Real-time tracking via SMS, GPRS, or mobile app.
Supports 4G LTE networks, with 2G/3G compatibility.
Built-in rechargeable battery (approx. 1500 mAh).
Alarm modes for movement, vibration, overspeed, and low battery.
Configurable geo-fencing alerts.
Integrated magnet for easy mounting on vehicles or metal surfaces.
Compatible with apps like TKSTAR, Winnes, or MyTKStar.
Standby time ranges from 3 to 25 days depending on usage and settings.
Accurate positioning: location accuracy typically between 5 and 10 meters.
Easy to install: no wiring required thanks to the built-in battery and magnet.
Good battery life: can last more than two weeks in sleep mode.
Wide network support: works on modern and legacy networks.
Affordable: offers many features for a low price.
High battery consumption in active mode: without proper sleep settings, the battery may last only a few days.
Sleep mode instability: in some cases, the device does not automatically switch to power-saving mode.
Notification delays via app: alerts may sometimes arrive with a delay depending on network conditions.
Non-intuitive apps: the official apps often lack localization and may be difficult to use.
Lack of clear documentation: users often report incomplete or unclear instructions in the box.
Note: On some newer models, the default password may not be 123456
, but instead the last 4 digits of the tracker’s ID number (usually printed on the label). Always check your device documentation.
Below is a list of the main SMS commands you can send to the TK913 to configure and control it remotely:
Function | SMS Command | Example |
---|---|---|
Set authorized number | admin123456 +countrycodephonenumber | admin123456 +391234567890 |
Request current location | smslink123456 or G123456# | smslink123456 |
Change password | password123456 newpassword | password123456 654321 |
Set APN | apn123456 your_apn_name | apn123456 web.omnitel.it |
Set APN username | apnuser123456 username | apnuser123456 vodafone |
Set APN password | apnpasswd123456 password | apnpasswd123456 vodafone |
Set server IP and port | adminip123456 IP PORT | adminip123456 195.201.123.45 7700 |
Switch to GPRS mode | gprs123456 | gprs123456 |
Switch to SMS mode | sms123456 | sms123456 |
Reboot device | reset123456 | reset123456 |
Auto tracking (every 30s, 5 times) | fix030s005n123456 | fix030s005n123456 |
Enable movement alarm | move123456 / nomove123456 | move123456 |
Enable vibration alarm | shock123456 / noshock123456 | shock123456 |
Enable overspeed alarm | speed123456 XX / nospeed123456 | speed123456 080 |
Check device status | check123456 | check123456 |
Remote power-off (if supported) | poweroff123456 | poweroff123456 |
The TK913 is a useful, compact, and feature-rich device ideal for users looking for a simple yet effective GPS tracking solution without high costs. It works well for both personal use (cars, bikes, kids, pets) and business applications (fleet tracking, logistics, security).
Sign up to vote this object, vote his reviews and to contribute to Tiiips.EvaluateClose | (0 comments) |
![]() | "Descrizione" about AI Video Generators – Cost Comparison for High-Quality Videos by Al222 (21098 pt) | 2025-May-13 19:04 | ![]() |
Read the full Tiiip | (Send your comment) |
Platform | Monthly Plan | Included Credits | Supported Resolutions | Cost per Video (1080p or 4K) | Estimated Videos/Month | Key Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PixVerse 4.5 | $30 | 6,000 | 360p–1080p | 80 credits (1080p) ≈ $0.40 | 75 (1080p) | Good quality, occasional facial distortions on complex prompts |
Kling 1.6 | $25.99 | 3,000 | ~720p–1080p (fixed) | 20 credits ≈ $0.17 | 150 | Best value for 1080p videos with solid realism |
Kling 2.0 Master | $25.99 / $32.56 | 3,000 | ~1080p (not scalable) | 100 credits ≈ $0.87 | 30 | Top-tier cinematic realism, higher cost per clip |
Runway Gen-3 Alpha | $28 | 2,250 | Up to 1080p | ~25 credits ≈ $0.31 | ~90 | Great balance between quality and affordability |
Pika Labs (Pro) | $35 | 2,000 | Up to 720p | ~50 credits ≈ $0.44 | ~40 (HQ) | User-friendly, but doesn’t reach full HD (1080p) |
Google Veo 2 | $20 + $0.50/sec | — | Up to 4K | $2.50 (5s) | — | Best visual fidelity, not budget-friendly for short content |
✅ Best for 1080p value:
Kling 1.6 delivers the most 1080p videos at the lowest price (~$0.17/video), with impressive visual quality.
Best cinematic quality:
Kling 2.0 Master and Google Veo 2 are premium choices for film-grade results but come at significantly higher costs.
Best balance:
Runway Gen-3 Alpha strikes a great compromise with high-quality 1080p videos at ~$0.31/clip, ideal for creators on a budget.
Resolution limit:
Pika Labs doesn’t support 1080p but remains useful for stylized or vertical formats (e.g., TikTok).
PixVerse handles 1080p affordably, though its realism doesn’t match Kling or Runway for facial consistency or motion accuracy.
Sign up to vote this object, vote his reviews and to contribute to Tiiips.EvaluateClose | (0 comments) |
![]() | "Descrizione" about Price comparison of AI video generators - Low resolution by Al222 (21098 pt) | 2025-May-13 19:40 | ![]() |
Read the full Tiiip | (Send your comment) |
AI video generators. Cost comparison for low-resolution videos (5 seconds)
Platform | Monthly subscription | Included credits | Cost per video (5s) | Supported resolution | Cost per video ($) | Videos/month | Key notes |
PixVerse 4.5 | $30 | 6,000 | 20 credits (360p) | 360p–1080p | ~$0.10 | 300 (360p) | Best for low-cost, flexible video production |
Kling 1.6 | $25.99 | 3,000 | 20 credits (5s) | ~720p–1080p (non-scalable) | ~$0.17 | 150 | More affordable than Kling 2.0; still delivers good quality |
Kling 2.0 Master | $25.99 / $32.56 | 3,000 | 100 credits (5s) | ~1080p (non-scalable) | ~$0.87 | 30 | High visual quality, but expensive for bulk production |
Runway Gen-3 Alpha | $28 | 2,250 | 5 credits/sec (Turbo mode) | Up to 1080p | ~$0.10 | ~90 (5s) | Great quality with efficient credit usage, but limited generation cap |
Pika Labs (Pro) | $35 | 2,000 | 5–10 credits/sec | Up to 720p | ~$0.12–$0.24 | ~200–400 (5s) | Flexible, beginner-friendly, moderate visual fidelity |
Google Veo 2 | $20 + $0.50/sec | — | — | Up to 4K | $2.50 (5s) | — | High-end quality; not suitable for low-res or high-volume generation |
Here is a more detailed explanation of the key observations relating to the comparison between the main AI video generators of 2025, considering in particular low resolution (360p-540p) and cost per video:
PixVerse 4.5 stands out as the cheapest option for generating a large volume of standard-resolution videos. At just 20 credits per 360p clip and with 6,000 credits per month for $30, you can generate up to 300 five-second videos.
It’s designed to be fast and user-friendly, producing good results especially in cartoon, anime, and stylized formats. While there can be some facial distortions in complex prompts, it’s perfect for TikTok, Instagram, YouTube Shorts, or bulk content creation.
Kling 1.6 allows you to create realistic 720p–1080p videos for just 20 credits per 5 seconds, making it very cost-effective (~$0.17 per video).
Although it lacks the advanced features of Kling 2.0 Master (like camera path control or ultra-smooth motion), it still delivers solid photo-realism and natural movement at a competitive price.
It’s ideal for users who want high quality without the high cost.
Kling 2.0 Master is aimed at cinematic or professional productions. It uses a 3D spatiotemporal attention model to create extremely realistic movement, facial expressions, and faithful prompt interpretation.
However, each video costs 100 credits, which limits users to only 30 clips per month on the Pro plan.
This is the best choice if visual quality is the top priority, but it's not suitable for mass production due to the high cost per clip.
Runway offers a Turbo mode that allows you to generate 1080p videos with excellent consistency in lighting, detail, and camera motion.
At ~25 credits per 5-second clip, and with 2,250 credits for $28, you can produce around 90 videos per month. That’s fewer than PixVerse, but the visual quality is noticeably higher.
It’s a great option if you want professional-level output without breaking the bank.
Pika Labs is well-regarded for its intuitive interface and support for diverse inputs (text, image, audio), generating videos up to 720p.
Cost per clip varies widely (5–10 credits per second), so a 5-second video may cost 50 credits ($0.44).
While suitable for stylized or animated content, it doesn’t reach the visual precision of Kling or Runway.
It’s a good fit for users seeking creativity and speed over realism.
Google Veo 2 (still in limited-access) aims to deliver 4K cinematic videos with outstanding detail and realism.
At $0.50 per second, that’s $2.50 for 5 seconds — much higher than competitors.
It’s clearly intended for advertising, film, or high-end creative work, not for daily or bulk content.
Sign up to vote this object, vote his reviews and to contribute to Tiiips.EvaluateClose | (0 comments) |
![]() | "Descrizione" about The Camera’s Close Call! by Al222 (21098 pt) | 2025-Mar-16 12:32 | ![]() |
Read the full Tiiip | (Send your comment) |
In other words: what can happen when my cat sees something really interesting below the water level and decides it’s time to go check it out.
Cats have an excellent sense of balance, but...
Why did I leave the camera by the pool?
A wet episode on YouTube
Sign up to vote this object, vote his reviews and to contribute to Tiiips.EvaluateClose | (0 comments) |
![]() | "Descrizione" about A cup of Canon? by Al222 (21098 pt) | 2025-Mar-15 11:55 | ![]() |
Read the full Tiiip | (Send your comment) |
I’ve used Canon for many years, and it has given me amazing photos.
When even Canon needs a relaxing break! Here’s the camera preparing to become the new drink of the moment: a delightful infusion of technology and creativity!
Warning: Don’t try this at home! Cameras are not suitable for infusions and tea. The risk of taking watered-down photos is too high!
Sign up to vote this object, vote his reviews and to contribute to Tiiips.EvaluateClose | (0 comments) |
![]() | "Descrizione" about Ranking: The Top 5 Most Expensive Video Cameras by Al222 (21098 pt) | 2025-Mar-10 14:05 | ![]() |
Read the full Tiiip | (Send your comment) |
Here are the top 5 models (without lenses and accessories) of video cameras among the most expensive on the market. Note: The entries from Phase One and Hasselblad, more than video cameras, are extraordinary medium-format cameras mainly designed for photography; however, for consistency with the "5 most expensive" ranking, we include them here. Prices are indicative and may vary depending on the retailer and country.
Description:
The ALEXA LF is an icon of high-end digital cinema. Used in many Hollywood productions, it boasts unparalleled image quality and build robustness, specifically designed for the professional movie set.
10 Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Description:
The Sony VENICE 2 is the flagship model in Sony's cinematic line. It offers a high-quality full-frame sensor, great flexibility in recording formats, and a modular design that easily adapts to different productions, from films to commercials.
10 Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Description:
The XF IQ4 150MP is a medium-format camera that leads the ultra-high-end professional photography sector. Although it is not designed as a video camera, we include it for completeness: its resolution and dynamic range make it the “Holy Grail” for fashion, advertising, and art photographers.
10 Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Description:
Another super-premium medium-format camera, the H6D-400c MS (Multi-Shot) stands out for its function of combining multiple shots to achieve incredible detail and color accuracy. It is a gem for still life, product, and architecture photographers.
10 Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Description:
The EOS C700 FF represents the pinnacle of Canon's cinematic line. Equipped with a Full-Frame sensor and extremely flexible recording formats, it is aimed at meeting the needs of high-budget television, film, and advertising productions.
10 Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Conclusion:
If you're looking for the best in image quality, robustness, and prestige, these five models (including the two medium-format cameras) dominate the ultra-high-end range. However, whether video cameras or medium-format cameras, we’re talking about prices that require budgets from film productions or luxury photography studios. And if these prices seem crazy… well, you're not the only one thinking that! But for professionals seeking absolute perfection (or those after an extreme status symbol), these tools represent the ultimate available today on the market. Happy choosing, and... watch your wallet!
Sign up to vote this object, vote his reviews and to contribute to Tiiips.EvaluateClose | (0 comments) |
![]() | "Descrizione" about Ranking: Top 5 lenses Canon, Nikon, Leica, Sony, Olympus by Al222 (21098 pt) | 2025-Mar-04 16:03 | ![]() |
Read the full Tiiip | (Send your comment) |
Ranking: Top 5 lenses Canon, Nikon, Leica, Sony, Olympus
Imagine stepping into a garage filled with dream supercars, each brand flaunting its most powerful, cutting-edge—and, of course, prohibitively priced—model. That’s exactly where we stand when talking about these five camera lenses. Each manufacturer has rolled out its own “hypercar”—a masterpiece of optical engineering that’ll get your pulse racing… but might also make your wallet sob.
If you’ve got the guts (and the funds) to take one of these beauties for a spin, get ready to tear up the photographic track like a pro driver, capturing reality with stunning sharpness and jaw-dropping color. For the rest of us, there’s always the (still quite enjoyable) option of admiring them from afar, daydreaming, and maybe starting a supercar-shaped piggy bank. After all, dreaming is free—unlike these lenses!
An overview of five high-end lenses designed for very specific photographic needs and with significant budgets in mind. We’ll discuss technical features, strengths, and potential limitations to provide a complete perspective for those considering such an investment.
What more can be said? Each of these lenses stands out as a top performer in its class and a dream for any photography enthusiast. Ultimately, the choice hinges on your camera system, the type of photography you do, and—above all—the budget you have.
Sign up to vote this object, vote his reviews and to contribute to Tiiips.EvaluateClose | (0 comments) |
Read other Tiiips in __Italiano (175)