Smoke flavor
Rating : 4.3
| Evaluation | N. Experts | Evaluation | N. Experts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | ||
| 2 | 7 | ||
| 3 | 8 | ||
| 4 | 9 | ||
| 5 | 10 |
10 pts from AColumn
| Sign up to vote this object, vote his reviews and to contribute to Tiiips.Evaluate | Where is this found? |
| "Descrizione" about Smoke flavor Review Consensus 10 by AColumn (9403 pt) | 2025-Nov-09 18:46 |
| Read the full Tiiip | (Send your comment) |
Smoke flavor (primary smoke condensate; derived smoke flavorings)
Description
• Flavoring preparations obtained by controlled pyrolysis of hardwood (e.g., hickory, oak, beech), capture of smoke, aqueous condensation, and fractionation to remove tar and reduce PAH.
• Supplied as liquid water-soluble concentrates, oil-soluble fractions, or powders (spray-dried on carriers such as salt or maltodextrin); intensity ranges from light “toast” to robust “bacon/ham” notes.
• Typical acidic profile with phenolic, carbonyl, and acidic notes; color from pale amber to dark brown.

Caloric value (per 100 g)
• Liquid concentrates: typically ≤20–60 kcal/100 g (mostly organic acids/carbonyls; negligible for use levels).
• Powders (spray-dried): 150–380 kcal/100 g depending on carrier; at flavor dosages the energy contribution is minimal.
Key constituents
• Phenols (e.g., guaiacol, syringol) → smoke character, antioxidant activity.
• Carbonyls (furfural, maltol, cyclotene) → sweetness/caramelized notes, browning reactivity.
• Organic acids (acetic, formic) → acidity, antimicrobial contribution; typical pH ~2.2–3.5.
• Trace lactones and other volatiles; PAH minimized by tar removal and purification.
• Analytical markers: total phenols, DNPH-carbonyls, pH, color (absorbance), volatile profile by GC–MS.
Production process
• Pyrolysis of selected hardwood chips under limited oxygen → smoke capture and water condensation.
• Phase separation (aqueous vs tar), filtration/centrifugation, optional extraction and rectification to tailor top/bottom notes.
• Concentration (vacuum), neutralization/blending, and standardization; spray-drying/encapsulation for powders.
• Manufactured under GMP/HACCP with controls for PAH, tar, and heavy metals.
Sensory and technological properties
• Provides authentic smoky aroma/taste without traditional smoking; can add surface color and mild antimicrobial effect (acids/phenols).
• Water-soluble liquids pick up well in brines/injections; oil-soluble types suit fats and coatings.
• Heat amplifies smoky, meaty and roasted notes (Maillard synergy with sugars/amino acids).
Food uses
• Meat and fish (brines, marinades, injections, surface sprays); snacks (seasonings), sauces, barbecue glazes, cheese/plant-based analogs, nuts, soups.
• Typical inclusion: 0.05–1.0% in finished products (optimize by pilot trials); surface treatments often in 2–10% solutions.
Nutrition and health
• Used at very low dosages; fat, sugar, and sodium depend on the carrier/system.
• Properly purified smoke flavors have far lower PAH than many traditionally smoked foods; compliance with applicable limits is essential.
• No specific health claims should be made unless authorized.
Lipid profile
• Fat negligible in aqueous concentrates; powder fat content reflects carrier systems (usually trace).
• Any residual lipids are trace and nutritionally insignificant (no relevant SFA/MUFA/PUFA contribution).
Quality and specifications (typical topics)
• pH, total phenols, DNPH-carbonyls, density/°Plato, color (A₄₂₀/A₄₅₀), and sensory intensity grade.
• PAH (e.g., benzo[a]pyrene) within specification; tar/insolubles controlled.
• Microbiology: compliant counts; absence of pathogens in powders.
• Solubility (water/oil), stability in salt/acid matrices, and carrier declaration for powders.
Storage and shelf-life
• Store cool, dark, in airtight containers (HDPE or stainless steel for liquids); protect from oxygen and moisture.
• Powders: keep dry, well-sealed; consider desiccant.
• Typical shelf-life 12–24 months (check supplier COA); apply FIFO.
Allergens and safety
• No inherent major allergens; check carriers (e.g., maltodextrin source) and any added sulfites.
• Highly acidic liquids can be corrosive to mild steel—use compatible materials.
• Ensure regulatory compliance for intended use and PAH limits.
INCI functions in cosmetics
• Listed as Aroma/Flavor; role: masking and smoky note in oral-care or novelty products (rare, niche use).
Troubleshooting
• Bitterness/astringency: over-dosage or heavy phenolic cut → select lighter fractions, reduce dose, add sweetness/fat.
• Color too dark/precipitate: tar carryover or heat abuse → improve clarification, filter, use lighter grade.
• Phase/separation in brines: solubility mismatch → switch to water-soluble type or emulsify.
• Metallic notes/corrosion: incompatible tanks/pipes → switch to HDPE/316L SS and monitor pH.
Sustainability and supply chain
• Use certified hardwood sources; capture/abate VOC emissions from pyrolysis.
• Wastewater managed to BOD/COD targets; energy recovery from hot gases; recyclable packaging.
• Full traceability under GMP/HACCP.
Conclusion
Smoke flavor offers consistent, controllable smokiness with low PAH risk when properly purified, enabling flexible application across meats, sauces, snacks, and plant-based foods. Selecting the right fraction, managing dose/pH/solubility, and enforcing spec limits are key to clean, authentic results.
Mini-glossary
• PAH — Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: potential contaminants formed during pyrolysis; must be minimized for safety.
• DNPH — 2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine method: derivatizes carbonyls for quantification (often by HPLC).
• HPLC — High-performance liquid chromatography: used for DNPH-carbonyls and other markers.
• GC–MS — Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry: identifies smoke volatiles (phenols, carbonyls, lactones).
• GMP — Good Manufacturing Practice: hygiene and process-control standards across production.
• HACCP — Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points: preventive system with defined CCP for safety.
• VOC — Volatile organic compounds: gaseous emissions from pyrolysis; require capture/abatement.
• BOD/COD — Biochemical/Chemical Oxygen Demand: wastewater load indicators for environmental control.
• FIFO — First in, first out: stock rotation using older lots first.
• SFA/MUFA/PUFA — Saturated/monounsaturated/polyunsaturated fatty acids: minimal relevance in smoke flavor concentrates (present only in traces).
Smoked flavoring products have increased in recent decades as barbecue use has expanded and are regulated in Europe by Regulation (EC) No. 1321/2013 (1). In this study, ten commonly used liquid smoke flavorings were analyzed and used two different solvents to investigate whether polar or nonpolar substances have the ability to cause toxic effects. The results indicated that the liquid smoke flavorings contain compounds with hazardous properties (2).
References_____________________________________________________________________
(1) https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/IT/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013R1321
(2) Selin E, Mandava G, Vilcu AL, Oskarsson A, Lundqvist J. An in vitro-based hazard assessment of liquid smoke food flavourings. Arch Toxicol. 2022 Feb;96(2):601-611. doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-03190-1. Epub 2021 Nov 20. PMID: 34799742; PMCID: PMC8837572.
Abstract. Liquid smoke products are widely used as a food additive to create a desired smoke flavour. These products may contain hazardous chemicals generated during the wood-burning process. However, the toxic effects of these types of hazardous chemicals constituting in the commercially available products are largely unknown. Therefore, a test battery of cell-based in vitro methods, covering different modes of actions of high relevance to human health, was applied to study liquid smoke products. Ten liquid smoke flavourings were tested as non-extracted and extracted. To assess the potential drivers of toxicity, we used two different solvents. The battery of in vitro methods covered estrogenicity, androgenicity, oxidative stress, aryl hydrocarbon receptor activity and genotoxicity. The non-extracted samples were tested at concentrations 0.002 to 1 μL liquid smoke flavouring/mL culture medium, while extracted samples were tested from 0.003 to 200 μL/mL. Genotoxicity was observed for nearly all non-extracted and all hexane-extracted samples, in which the former had higher potency. No genotoxicity was observed for ethyl acetate-extracted samples. Oxidative stress was activated by almost all extracted and non-extracted samples, while approximately half of the samples had aryl hydrocarbon receptor and estrogen receptor activities. This study used effect-based methods to evaluate the complex mixtures of liquid smoke flavourings. The increased bioactivities seen upon extractions indicate that non-polar chemicals are driving the genotoxicity, while polar substances are increasing oxidative stress and cytotoxic responses. The differences in responses indicate that non-extracted products contain chemicals that are able to antagonize toxic effects, and upon extraction, the protective substances are lost. © 2021. The Author(s).
_
Rambla-Alegre M, Tienpont B, Mitsui K, Masugi E, Yoshimura Y, Nagata H, David F, Sandra P. Coupling gas chromatography and electronic nose detection for detailed cigarette smoke aroma characterization. J Chromatogr A. 2014 Oct 24;1365:191-203. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.09.015.
Wang H, Chambers E 4th, Kan J. Sensory Characteristics of Combinations of Phenolic Compounds Potentially Associated with Smoked Aroma in Foods. Molecules. 2018 Jul 26;23(8). pii: E1867. doi: 10.3390/molecules23081867.
Abstract. The sensory characteristics of phenolic compounds combinations were evaluated. A highly trained descriptive panel evaluated combinations of chemicals (two chemicals at a time) containing either one smoky aroma and one non-smoky aroma chemical compound, two smoky aroma chemicals, or two non-smoky aroma chemicals. The non-smoky compounds had been associated with smoke aroma in other studies, but were not found to be smoky when tested individually. Smoked flavor characteristics and intensities were changed significantly when two phenolic compounds were combined. Non-smoky phenolic compounds often contributed the smoked flavor when combined with one smoky phenolic compound or another non-smoky phenolic compound. It is necessary to understand the sensory characteristics of compound combinations as well as individual compounds.
Parker JK, Lignou S, Shankland K, Kurwie P, Griffiths HD, Baines DA. Development of a Zeolite Filter for Removing Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) from Smoke and Smoked Ingredients while Retaining the Smoky Flavor. J Agric Food Chem. 2018 Mar 14;66(10):2449-2458. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05399.
Abstract. The popularity of smoked foodstuffs such as sauces, marinades, and rubs is on the rise. However, during the traditional smoking process, in addition to the desirable smoky aroma compounds, harmful polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are also generated. In this work, a selective filter was developed that reduces PAH concentrations in a smoke by up to 90% while maintaining a desirable smoky flavor. Preliminary studies using a cocktail of 12 PAHs stirred with a zeolite showed the potential for this zeolite to selectively remove PAHs from a simple solution. However, pretreatment of the smoke prior to application removed the PAHs more efficiently and is more widely applicable to a range of food ingredients. Although volatile analysis showed that there was a concomitant reduction in the concentration of the smoky compounds such as 2-methoxyphenol (guaiacol), 2-methylphenol ( o-cresol), and the isoeugenols, sensory profiling showed that the difference in perception of flavor was minimal.
| Sign up to vote this object, vote his reviews and to contribute to Tiiips.EvaluateClose | (0 comments) |
Read other Tiiips about this object in __Italiano (1)
Component type:   Chemical Main substances:   Last update:   2025-10-28 12:09:01 | Chemical Risk:   |

