Hello, Guest!
 
 

🔍
REVIEW

Description

Al222
Al222 (25123 pt) 2025-Nov-01 17:18

Chicken breast (Gallus gallus domesticus)

Description

  • Lean cut from the pectoral muscle, typically boneless and skinless, composed mainly of white, fast-glycolytic fibers.

  • Color: pale pink rawopaque white cooked; fine, tender texture when not overcooked; mild flavor suited to many preparations.

  • Sold chilled (vacuum/MAP), frozen, or marinated (salt, herbs, oils; some processed items may include permitted phosphates per regulation).

Caloric value (per 100 g)

  • Raw, skinless: ~105–120 kcal (protein ~23 g; fat ~1–2.5 g; carbohydrate ~0 g; very low intrinsic sodium).

  • Cooked (grill/roast): ~155–170 kcal (concentration after moisture loss; protein ~30–32 g; fat ~3–4 g).

  • Final energy depends on cooking method and added fats/sauces.

Key constituents

  • Complete proteins (myofibrillar actin/myosin; sarcoplasmic proteins) with high biological value.

  • Minerals: phosphorus, selenium, potassium; moderate iron.

  • Vitamins: B group (niacin B3, pyridoxine B6, traces of B12).

  • Lipids: naturally low in breast; composition detailed under “Lipid profile.”

  • Technological markers: ultimate pH ~5.7–6.0, water-holding capacity (drip loss), L*a*b* color, absence of hematomas/tendons.

Production process

  • Humane stunning → slaughter, evisceration, and rapid chilling (air or immersion).

  • Deboning and trimming of connective tissue/fat; optional marination (salt, sugars, flavors; permitted polyphosphates within limits).

  • Packaging: vacuum/MAP high-barrier films; full traceability under GMP/HACCP with CCP for temperature, hygiene, and foreign-body control.

Sensory and technological properties

  • Juiciness: good water retention when pH and handling are correct; light brines (1–2% salt) improve juiciness.

  • Gelation: myofibrillar proteins salt-solubilize and form heat-set gels—useful in roasts, roulades, emulsified mixes.

  • Drying tendency: low fat means overcooking dries; gentle methods (poaching, sous-vide, indirect heat) preserve tenderness.

  • Potential defects: PSE (pale, soft, exudative) lowers yield; DFD (dark, firm, dry) uncommon but possible.

Food uses

  • Grilled/roasted, sautéed/stir-fried, poached/boiled, breaded/fried, skewers, stuffed, ground for patties/balls, low-temperature sous-vide (60–65 °C with validated lethality).

  • Applications: salads, wraps, curries/stir-fries, scaloppine, cutlets, stocks/broths.

Nutrition and health

  • High protein density with low fat in the breast cut; sodium low unless brined/seasoned.

  • Not among major EU allergens; rare chicken-meat allergies exist.

  • Food safety: raw poultry may carry Salmonella/Campylobacter → cook to ≥75 °C core, avoid cross-contamination, keep at ≤4 °C.

  • For lipid-conscious diets: prefer lean cooking and moderate SFA-rich sauces.

Lipid profile

  • Skinless breast is low-fat; when present, typical chicken pattern: ~25–35% SFA (saturated fatty acids; excess may raise LDL), ~35–45% MUFA (monounsaturated fatty acids, mainly oleic; generally favorable/neutral for blood lipids), ~20–30% PUFA (polyunsaturated fatty acids, mainly linoleic; beneficial when balanced). TFA (industrial trans fatty acids) absent; MCT (medium-chain triglycerides) not characteristic.

Quality and specifications (typical topics)

  • Appearance: uniform color, no off-odors, limited purge, dry/non-slimy surface.

  • pH 5.7–6.0, low aerobic counts (pathogens absent/25 g); residues/contaminants within limits.

  • Packaging: intact barrier/seal; cold chain maintained.

  • Labeling: origin, date, and any marinades/additives declared.

Storage and shelf-life

  • Chilled 0–4 °C: 2–4 days (fresh); vacuum/MAP may extend to 7–10 days if well managed.

  • Frozen ≤−18 °C: up to 8–12 months; thaw under refrigeration.

  • Cooked: 3–4 days refrigerated.

Allergens and safety

  • Chicken is not one of the “top 14” EU allergens; watch cross-contact with soy, milk, gluten, mustard, celery in mixed kitchens/lines.

  • Adhere to GMP/HACCP; key CCP: temperature control, utensil/surface hygiene, separation of raw vs cooked.

INCI functions in cosmetics

  • Not a standard cosmetic raw material. Related derivatives used elsewhere include Hydrolyzed Collagen (often non-species-specific) and Hydrolyzed Keratin (other animals). Always verify origin/compliance.

Troubleshooting

  • Dry/tough meat: overcooking → use a thermometer, gentle heat, rest after cooking, light brining.

  • Flat flavor: weak Maillard browning → pat dry, brief sear, timely salt (0.5–1% dry brine).

  • Excess purge: too-cold pan or very cold meat → temper briefly, cook at proper heat, avoid piercing.

  • Uneven doneness: variable thickness → butterfly/pound or use indirect heat.

Sustainability and supply chain

  • Poultry generally has lower GHG and water footprints than ruminant meats; improve via animal welfare, prudent antibiotic use, and sustainable feed.

  • Plants: treat effluents to BOD/COD targets; energy recovery; recyclable packaging; full traceability under GMP/HACCP.

Conclusion
Chicken breast offers high-quality protein, low fat, broad culinary versatility, and sound processing functionality. Tight control of the cold chain, core temperature, and juiciness-preserving techniques (brining, dry salting, resting) delivers safe, succulent, and repeatable results.


Mini-glossary

  • SFASaturated fatty acids: Excess intakes can raise LDL cholesterol; moderate and balance with unsaturated fats.

  • MUFAMonounsaturated fatty acids (e.g., oleic): Generally favorable/neutral for blood lipids.

  • PUFAPolyunsaturated fatty acids (e.g., linoleic/ALA): Beneficial when balanced; more oxidation-prone.

  • TFATrans fatty acids: Industrial TFAs should be avoided; not expected in unprocessed chicken fat.

  • MCTMedium-chain triglycerides (C6–C12): Not characteristic of chicken fat.

  • GMP/HACCPGood Manufacturing Practice / Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points: Hygiene and preventive-safety systems with defined CCP.

  • CCPCritical control point: Processing step where a control prevents/reduces a hazard (e.g., cook temperature, sanitation).

  • BOD/CODBiochemical/Chemical oxygen demand: Wastewater impact indicators for processing plants.

References__________________________________________________________________________

English DR, MacInnis RJ, Hodge AM, Hopper JL, Haydon AM, Giles GG. Red meat, chicken, and fish consumption and risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004 Sep;13(9):1509-14.

Abstract. Background: Red meat and processed meat consumption have been associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer in some, but not all, relevant cohort studies. Evidence on the relationship between risk of colorectal cancer and poultry and fish consumption is inconsistent.  Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 37,112 residents of Melbourne, Australia recruited from 1990 to 1994. Diet was measured with a food frequency questionnaire. We categorized the frequency of fresh red meat, processed meat, chicken, and fish consumption into approximate quartiles. Adenocarcinomas of the colon or rectum were ascertained via the Victorian Cancer Registry. Results: We identified 283 colon cancers and 169 rectal cancers in an average of 9 years of follow-up. For rectal cancer, the hazard ratios [95% confidence intervals (95% CI)] in the highest quartile of consumption of fresh red meat and processed meat were 2.3 (1.2-4.2; P for trend = 0.07) and 2.0 (1.1-3.4; P for trend = 0.09), respectively. The corresponding hazard ratios (95% CIs) for colon cancer were 1.1 (0.7-1.6; P for trend = 0.9) and 1.3 (0.9-1.9; P for trend = 0.06). However, for neither type of meat was the heterogeneity between subsites significant. Chicken consumption was weakly negatively associated with colorectal cancer (hazard ratio highest quartile, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.6-1.0; P for trend = 0.03), whereas hazard ratios for fish consumption were close to unity. Conclusion: Consumption of fresh red meat and processed meat seemed to be associated with an increased risk of rectal cancer. Consumption of chicken and fish did not increase risk.

Chong EW, Simpson JA, Robman LD, Hodge AM, Aung KZ, English DR, Giles GG, Guymer RH. Red meat and chicken consumption and its association with age-related macular degeneration. Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Apr 1;169(7):867-76. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn393. 

Abstract. Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness among older people, and diet has been postulated to alter risk of AMD. To evaluate associations between red meat and chicken intake and AMD, the authors conducted a cohort study of 6,734 persons aged 58-69 years in 1990-1994 in Melbourne, Australia. Meat intake was estimated from a food frequency questionnaire at baseline. At follow-up (2003-2006), bilateral digital macular photographs were taken and evaluated for AMD (1,680 cases of early AMD, 77 cases of late AMD). Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios, adjusted for age, smoking, and other potential confounders. Higher red meat intake was positively associated with early AMD; the odds ratio for consumption of red meat > or =10 times/week versus <5 times/week was 1.47 (95% confidence interval: 1.21, 1.79; P-trend < 0.001). Similar trends toward increasing prevalence of early AMD were seen with higher intakes of fresh and processed red meat. Conversely, consumption of chicken > or =3.5 times/week versus <1.5 times/week was inversely associated with late AMD (odds ratio = 0.43, 95% confidence interval: 0.20, 0.91; P-trend = 0.007). These results suggest that different meats may differently affect AMD risk and may be a target for lifestyle modification.

Navas-Carretero S, Cuervo M, Abete I, Zulet MA, Martínez JA. Frequent consumption of selenium-enriched chicken meat by adults causes weight loss and maintains their antioxidant status. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2011 Oct;143(1):8-19. doi: 10.1007/s12011-010-8831-x. 

Abstract. To assess the effects of a moderately high-protein intake on the body composition, biochemical, and antioxidant status parameters in young adults depending on either selenium- (Se) or non-enriched chicken consumption. The volunteers (n = 24) that completed the 10-week nutritional intervention were distributed in two parallel groups and randomly assigned to follow an isocaloric diet with moderately high content in protein (30% energy), either with the consumption of four 200 g portions/week of Se- or non-enriched chicken breasts. Blood samples were taken at the beginning and at the end of the study and body composition was monitored during the trial. There was a significant reduction in weight, accompanying a decrease on fat mass in both groups, while fat-free mass remained unchanged during the 10 weeks of intervention, without differences between both dietary groups. Selenium blood levels and plasma glutathione peroxidase activity, as well as lipid, glucose, and selected inflammation biomarkers remained stable during the intervention period in both dietary groups. Frequent chicken consumption, within a controlled diet with a moderately high content in protein, produced a slight but statistically significant weight reduction mainly due to the loss of fat mass. An extra Se supplementation (22 μg/day) in the Se-enriched chicken breast did not affect tachyphylactic antioxidant status of the participants neither inflammatory-related markers after weight loss.

Barbosa ACS, Mendes PS, Mattos G, Fuchs RHB, Marques LLM, Beneti SC, Heck SC, Droval AA, Cardoso FAR. Comparative analysis of the use of natural and synthetic antioxidants in chicken meat: an update review. Braz J Biol. 2023 Oct 23;83:e275539. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.275539. 

Abstract. The search for healthy foods has attracted the industry's attention to developing products that use natural ingredients, including natural antioxidants. Antioxidants act as free radicals or oxygen scavengers, inhibiting lipid oxidation and adversely affecting meat products' sensory and nutritional quality. Several synthetic antioxidants have been used in the meat industry; however, studies point to health risks related to their consumption. Such fact drives research into natural antioxidants extracted from grains, oilseeds, spices, fruits, and vegetables, which may have a health-promoting effect. This manuscript evaluates the effectiveness of several natural antioxidants in improving the quality and shelf life of chicken meat products during processing, storage, and distribution. The potential effects of natural antioxidants widely used in chicken products are also discussed. It can be concluded that these natural antioxidants are possible substitutes for synthetic ones. However, their use can affect the product's characteristics.

Connolly G, Campbell WW. Poultry Consumption and Human Cardiometabolic Health-Related Outcomes: A Narrative Review. Nutrients. 2023 Aug 11;15(16):3550. doi: 10.3390/nu15163550. 

Abstract. Poultry meats, in particular chicken, have high rates of consumption globally. Poultry is the most consumed type of meat in the United States (US), with chicken being the most common type of poultry consumed. The amounts of chicken and total poultry consumed in the US have more than tripled over the last six decades. This narrative review describes nutritional profiles of commonly consumed chicken/poultry products, consumption trends, and dietary recommendations in the US. Overviews of the scientific literature pertaining to associations between, and effects of consuming chicken/poultry on, body weight and body composition, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are provided. Limited evidence from randomized controlled trials indicates the consumption of lean unprocessed chicken as a primary dietary protein source has either beneficial or neutral effects on body weight and body composition and risk factors for CVD and T2DM. Apparently, zero randomized controlled feeding trials have specifically assessed the effects of consuming processed chicken/poultry on these health outcomes. Evidence from observational studies is less consistent, likely due to confounding factors such as a lack of a description of and distinctions among types of chicken/poultry products, amounts consumed, and cooking and preservation methods. New experimental and observational research on the impacts of consuming chicken/poultry, especially processed versions, on cardiometabolic health is sorely needed.

Toh DWK, Wong CH, Fam J, Kim JE. Daily consumption of essence of chicken improves cognitive function: a systematically searched meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutr Neurosci. 2021 Mar;24(3):236-247. doi: 10.1080/1028415X.2019.1619984. 

Abstract. Essence of chicken (EC) is a dietary supplement with potential benefits on one's cognitive performance. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the effects of consuming EC on cognitive function, applying extensively represented domains. Six databases were systematically searched to yield 1760 articles. These articles were independently screened to obtain 8 eligible articles with a pooled population of 794 subjects which is more than twice the population size considered in the previous meta-analyses. Largely, favorable effects on cognitive function were observed following daily EC intake, specifically in the working memory domain (standardized mean difference: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.46), one of the core components in executive function which showed statistically significant results. Furthermore, the observed results were also robust to sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses. This suggests that when consumed daily, EC may improve the mental processing aspect of cognitive function amongst the healthy population.

Ahmad S, Ahmed I, Haider S, Batool Z, Ahmed SB. Daily consumption of commercial chicken feed and meat lead to alterations in serum cholesterol and steroidal sex hormones in female rats. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2017 Jan;30(1 Suppl):257-261. 

Abstract. Poultry consumption is increased worldwide owing to better taste, easy availability and low cost. The present study was designed to investigate the effects of the chicken feed, conventional chicken meat and organic chicken meat on the % growth rate, serum cholesterol, progesterone, testosterone and estrogen levels in female rats. Hundred female Albino Wistar rats were randomly assigned to four groups (n=25). Group I was control rats fed on standard chow, group II treated with commercial chicken feed, group III rats fed with conventional chicken meat and group IV with organic chicken meat for a period of 6 weeks. % Growth rate, serum cholesterol, progesterone, testosterone and estrogen levels were estimated after the treatment. The present study showed significant increase in growth rate, serum cholesterol levels and imbalance in serum steroidal hormone levels. It is therefore, suggested from the present study that the intake of commercial chicken feed and commercial chicken meat may be the potential cause of development of polycystic ovary syndrome in females due to steroid hormonal imbalance.